Author: A. Steen
Date: 15:16:21 11/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2005 at 10:39:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 24, 2005 at 10:31:17, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >>Hello A. Steen. >>The problem of antichess is more complex that its looks in a simple evaluation. >>To fix engines will create not compatibles paradigmas : Why ? > >>1- Bercouse Top engines that will be fixing, wont be Word Chess Computer >>Champion in a combat between engines that have present kind of module >>preferences. > >I disagree here. > >I think that it is not easy but it may be possible to do it in a productive way. >The main problem is to evaluate correctly closed positions. > >part of them are not drawn so evaluating them as a draw is certainly not a >solution. > >Uri This thread is in a circle now, Uri! A parent post (Dr. Wael Deeb, 463878) is moderator-deleted. And as per- http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?464005 you can see I already wrote almost the same thing that you wrote above. I wrote- "[improvements may happen in] avoiding closed positions breaking out of closed positions, sacrificing if necessary" :) So this discussion is in a circle. And avoiding going in circles is EXACTLY what programs need to defeat this anti-chess play. Best, A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.