Author: A. Steen
Date: 16:03:09 11/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2005 at 10:31:17, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>Hello A. Steen.
>The problem of antichess is more complex that its looks in a simple evaluation.
>To fix engines will create not compatibles paradigmas : Why ? >
>1- Bercouse Top engines that will be fixing, wont be Word Chess Computer
>Champion in a combat between engines that have present kind of module
>preferences.
>2- And about Top human beings chess players..... What are they going to do? They
>are going finally been playing a pure antichess(at lest some times), becouse
>they are going to be in serious trobles with many many "anticomputer experts"
>that know that they are not making a good Job like last game from Ponomartiov
>against Junior.
>3- In my humbble opinion = There are not solution, ............ the paradigmas
>are going to be broken ......... and a "new chess will be played by the best
>human beings" ,,,,,,,antichess=destructive chess=chess in the other fase of the
>coin= a chess where you only want to be runing from the oponent to destroy
>him-her-it .......etc
>Best,
>Pablo
Thank you, Pablo, for the response. I enjoy your writing more than I enjoy your
250-move games. :)
You make a serious point.
Here follows my view - but remember, I am a "proven" patzer according to the
~2250 rated elite (LOL!) here, who felt it useful to declare their ELO to me to
intimidate my destruction of their analyses. :)
Your point must be that, even if the programs find a way of fighting 'your'
anti-chess, doing so will make them weaker in other ways (and against other
engines).
But if "Is my opponent a human?" and "My opponent is a human; is he playing
anti-chess?" detectors can be built into a program, and even if they work only
very unreliably, that, in combination with better knowledge about
detecting/avoiding/breaking closed positions, may be enough to remove your
threat.
It won't be easy, I know.
I have no interest in your anti-chess as I am motivated by the wish to improve
my chess (from total patzer level to that of mid-ranking patzer level). I do
this at present by improving my winning against F9/S9 by strategic superiority
and tactical control and carefulness ("very, very, very carefully").
Best,
A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.