Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A. STEEN vs. FRUIT 2.2.1 - Nice game but irrelevant to conclude ...

Author: A. Steen

Date: 05:21:38 11/25/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2005 at 07:48:44, Swaminathan wrote:

>On November 25, 2005 at 05:27:34, A. Steen wrote:

>>By the way, your user profile is blank.  If you leave your profile blank here,
>>it is an invitation to the numerous trolls and abusive patzers (I do not at all
>>mind non-abusive patzers, and for me "patzers" is not an insulting term - but
>>here the patzers even boast about their FIDE ratings!) to attack and libel you.
>>I speak from terrifying personal experience! :)


>Excuse me,I never attacked you


Correct.


> and I never mentioned my own FIDE rating.



Correct.



>I just
>asked you what your rating is because your profile is incomplete.



Correct.



>If you are referring to someone,



 .. you can clearly see that someone cannot be you, because you never did those
things.

Therefore, it was not you.  No such intention.  Your posts are friendly and you
appear highly intelligent.  So set your mind at rest.  The last lad from Madras
I duelled with made WC. :)

I am referring to several posters who are not "Swaminathan", and for whom the
above corresponding above three answers would not be "Correct" x 3 but
"Incorrect" x 3.

:)



>tell me who it is?



Because of the Orwellian workings here, an explicit answer by me is unwise if
you want to keep reading Steenian logic. :)  You don't want to have me ejected
to CTF surely? :)

Because the board SEARCH function seems to be only a joke function, I recommend
you quickly go to -
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/index.html?from=0&to=168&view_by=thread
and use your browser Search function.  Search for "Steen", the problems are
usually around there.  :)

While many of the worst messages have been deleted thanks to the moderators (I
can take the insults and stupidities, but it is a waste of board bandwidth and
an abuse to other members), you will find what you need. One posted an example
of something that was exactly a counter-example. Another two (NOT Uri Blass)
claimed that 26. .. Ra-g8! by Kasimdzhanov was a terrible nonsense blunder, and
I proved it was a brilliancy and very practical.  Another claimed most positions
I said were dead draws weren't, and I proved they were, and I proved a few more
things beside. :)  You won't find everything, as much is now in the bit-bucket.



>There are probably less posters here who have FIDE ratings.


Many have.  The smart ones don't advertise them because of reverse look-up and
trolls.

Best,

A.S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.