Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 10:41:23 11/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2005 at 15:16:21, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On November 24, 2005 at 13:23:58, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On November 24, 2005 at 11:06:11, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On November 23, 2005 at 15:28:15, Sune Larsson wrote: >>> >>>>On November 23, 2005 at 15:20:11, Ovidio Santistevan wrote: >>>> >>>>>Looking at the results, as of today, the programs are clerly ahead in this >>>>>tourn.: >>>>>People 2.5 >>>>>Programs 6.5 >>>>>Now, if these strong GMs had spent some time analyzing Father's games against >>>>>programs, the results might have been different: they could have learned how to >>>>>play against machines... >>>>>Just a thought. >>>> >>>> You mean like Ponomariov in today's round? Pono was clearly uninterested in >>>>playing chess... >>>> >>>>/S >>> >>>Are you serious? >>>Ponomariov had the black pieces and no chance to play for a win early in this >>>game. You can hardly expect him to open the position for the white bishop pair. >>>The Junior programmer thought white is better and played on. >>> >>>Michael >> >> >> Of course I'm serious. Why do you think Ruslan chose this variation? >> >> /S > >Maybe because he was sucessful with 3...Bb4 in the past? > >Maybe because programs do not play the Winawer positions very well? > >Michael So you know - then why ask these questions of the ignorant? If you are still in doubt - then ask Ruslan himself - he will answer... /S
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.