Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:10:16 03/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 1999 at 17:53:22, Robert Trombley wrote: >I have setup several identical positions on both machines and timed them to see >how long it took to find the best move. I have setup about 10 unique positions, >and discovered that at least for these positions, the PIII is on average only 3X >faster. In other words, if it took the P150 30 seconds to find the best move, >the PIII-500 would find it in about 10 seconds. I would have guessed that the >faster machine should be at least 7X faster. The program I used was Genius 5 >dos with 31M hash and normal settings. On the PIII-500 it did poorly against >Crafty clones on 5 minute games with 5 second increments for entering moves >manually. Granted, I am giving time odds to the clones, and I did not play a >large enough number of games. Does the 3X factor sound correct? I would trust the data, it shows it is only 3x faster at running Chessgenius5, but other chess programs and different programs may run faster then 3x over the P150 cyrix. Bench some 32bit chess programs, like CM6000, or CM5000.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.