Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:19:43 11/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
i don't think it is nitsche. they numbered the modules, Mephisto III in the small black box. the same module in the modular system was named MM1. the B+P had no number. it was Rathsmann Program and A-strategy. you can identify the B+P with the strange Setup for Positions and the strange verify-position functions. press the button for the piece you want to see, and the leds on board are wild ON. thats different with the MM1 and the other MM concepts. MM2 was the module with the NORMAL concept of I/O behaviur. MM3 was Rebel !! Module !! MM4 was the Rebel-Module with the Mephisto I/O concept. as you can see there IS a logic behind all this. first they buy something and have not the time to make it FITTING. and later they have the same program in the known I/O concept. when you write BEHAVIOUR, how do you know it is selective ?! does it show information about this ? in the display ? how deep is the selective component ?? it could be that somebody found a way to bring the Rebel program into the B+P or MM2 Module. As far as i remember it, the B+P run on 3.7. what is the search depth of the module ?! Does it show 2 components ? M3 S7 ?? if it shows 2 components it could e.g. be the ROMAII. but you said 6502 CPU ? I don't think there was EVER a 6502 of Nitsche/henne. I have spoken lately about transforming the Mephisto III program with Thomas Nitsche, and he said to me, the reason WHY it was never brought to other CPU's was the language he programmed the thing. today few people can program this language.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.