Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 10:58:30 11/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2005 at 13:01:05, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Andy, reasonably put, but I must strongly object. > >The reason why is simply that you confuse arrogance and brilliance. How, to the >hell of it, should someone like that avoid NOT to appear in arrogance to such >folks? We are not in RL but VL. I come from chess like you too, and therefore I >know that we are all a bit feeling too important. And against the best player on >this planet all others are weak and unimportant. From a wrong perspective. I for >one estimate all players from coffeehouse master to GM. Cant you get the forced >factors for someone who knows chess here in CCC? Just dont take it as offence. >Because he entered at the time of this Bilbao event. >He would never have stayed very long. > >But why asking no questions to such a knowie? Why getting him into our usual >level? Who else did ever give himself here for a tempo analyses of >computergames? Not that I would allow him any extra rights. But he didn't insult >at all! This is my claim. But he was insulted upwards and below the navel. I >will prove that shortly in a new message. First, I understand that he choose to post not under his real name. Alas he was correctly treated like a nobody. Secondly, he was trolling a lot. What was that nonsense about Fruit is easier to beat than Chessbase products? I'm a scientist, and I want to see proves to such statements. I'll not be satisfied with a dubious game. Don't get me wrong. I can very well imagine that he is correct. Frans, Mark and Bob spend years in improving their engines performance against humans. Fabien just started, and I don't know if he tuned against humans at all. I didn't like the way of his posts. If you make loud tunes you will get a lot of reactions. - Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.