Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:43:16 11/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2005 at 18:50:57, Martin Giepmans wrote: > >IIRC Steen admitted that 1 game doesn't prove anything at all. His conclusions >were based on what he described as the "feel" that he got when he played Fruit. >I think we, as chessplayers, all know what he means by that, don't we? >We don't have to play hundreds of games to "feel" that player A (computer or >human) is stronger than player B, at least against us. > > No, he was talking about continual games where he got up to >70% at a certain moment he was talking about.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.