Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 16:46:51 03/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 1999 at 11:47:43, Will Singleton wrote: >On March 23, 1999 at 04:18:51, odell hall wrote: > >>> I think my suspicious are pretty much confirmed, I did a little investigating >>of this guy's history, I notice that he has beaten other computers also, Even >>Hiarcs 7!! running on a pent 266 at game in 30. This appears to be a feat >>beyond the ability of a mere 2200. Also the guy gave me his name, I looked it >>up at the uscf home page, and it list his rating as 752!!!! Now I will give his >>handle. Zombie-pawn!! > >Thanks for the info. If the facts are as you state, then your assumption is >reasonable. > >Will Lets look at what you wrote, Will. If the facts are as you state ( which we do not know that they are) then your assumption is reasonable. (it is still an assumption, not fact, and reasonable still means there could be doubt) You should know will from your previous actions like this that you should know it is wrong. accusing someone in which only one person has found him guilty, and that one person really has no power to do anything. And even if all members find him guilty here, if the chess server does not throw him out, then they say he is not cheating, which gives this person all the power in the world to say he was not cheating. Ans us all wrong, and thus we have opinions which are wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.