Author: Mark Young
Date: 02:11:05 03/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 1999 at 01:15:13, Peter Kappler wrote: > >Most of us agree that the top human players are still quite a bit stronger than >any commercial chess program at regular tournament time controls (40/2). > >It is also not debatable that as the time control gets faster, the relative >strength of the computers increases. And this leads to my question: > >At what speed are the computers clearly stronger? How fast would the game have >to be for you to put your money on a top-micro instead of a top GM like Kasparov >or Anand? > >Here are my opinions: > >40/2 super-GM wins pretty easily. >G/60 super-GM, but the games are interesting. Rebel 10's performence would suggest that a computer may be better then a super-GM from here down. >G/15 super-GM, but now the games are very well-fought. >G/5 super-GM, but I would be nervous about my money... >G/3 computer >G/1 computer by a mile > > >This might make a good poll question... > > >--Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.