Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:33:34 03/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 1999 at 08:56:14, Matthew Herman wrote: >I have been doing some research (i.e. comp vs comp games at high time controls) >and I have seen that there ARE some openings that are TACTICAL, yet very bad for >computers (this relates to dann corbit's posts). For instance the Velirimovic >attack, white will often sacrifice a N on d5 or f5 to remove the valuable e6 >pawn (without which the kingside usually crumbles), yet computers snap this up >instantly. Also in some variations of the yugoslav, computers don't see white's >powerful attack before it is too late. Also if playing against computers w/ out >books, sometimes the dragon (as black) is strong, as without the books some >programs DON't find the h4-h5 idea. > >This is very relevant material, maybe it will be knowledge added to programs >that will solve this, maybe not. > >Still computers dont "know" the opening, so they don't play it as well as the >normal GM would (in some cases). Could you post some EPD positions where computers make the wrong choice? I am *very* interested in this.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.