Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Slander??? Not when you speak the truth as one sees it!!

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 12:47:09 03/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 1999 at 14:45:52, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Slander implies two additional things:
>   * Intent to harm (having ill will towards the one slandered)
>   * The charges are not true.

Dann,

The act of slandering requires neither intent nor falsehood of statement. It is
merely the act of making statements that are injurious to the reputation or well
being of a person. It is often accompanied with an intent to harm or a falsehood
of statements, but these are not required.

This is the reason that the media uses words like "alleged" and "purportedly". A
person is not a killer (even after he is convicted), he is an alleged killer or
a convicted killer. If the media said that someone was a killer (regardless of
the intent of the media or the facts of the matter), it would be slandering that
person (although when they do say such things, they rarely get tagged for it).
Ok, this is enough off topic for one day.

KarinsDad :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.