Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: At what time control could a commercial program be World Champion?

Author: Todd Durham

Date: 15:24:40 03/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 1999 at 08:23:16, Albert Silver wrote:

>On March 24, 1999 at 01:15:13, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>>
>>Most of us agree that the top human players are still quite a bit stronger than
>>any commercial chess program at regular tournament time controls (40/2).
>>
>>It is also not debatable that as the time control gets faster, the relative
>>strength of the computers increases.  And this leads to my question:
>>
>>At what speed are the computers clearly stronger?  How fast would the game have
>>to be for you to put your money on a top-micro instead of a top GM like Kasparov
>>or Anand?
>>
>>Here are my opinions:
>>
>>40/2  super-GM wins pretty easily.
>>G/60  super-GM, but the games are interesting.
>>G/15  super-GM, but now the games are very well-fought.
>>G/5   super-GM, but I would be nervous about my money...
>>G/3   computer
>
>Hard to say. Depends on the length of the match and of course the player's form.
>In 5-6 games, I'd give the micro a clear nod anyhow, but in 20 games I think the
>Super GM would come out on top. Of course, it also depends on the micro. Throw
>the thing on an Digital Alpha and I'll bet all my chips on the machine. The
>biggest problem with g/3 and g/5 especially, is the time lost making the move. A
>player like Hawkeye (IM Schmaltz) or Dlugy (GM Dlugy) from ICC are monstrous g/1
>players (you have to see them to believe it. No pieces hanging and they actually
>play chess) but they can NEVER compete against a program because every move they
>make will lose time and is therefore a death warrant. Curiously I don't think
>that in g/1 comps play much better than them. They don't hang pieces as well,
>but they don't see very far and here the GM's positional instincts might become
>a factor.
>
>                                     Albert Silver

I've watched Dlugy play 1 0 and you're right, it's astounding! So what about
Dlugy (or other strong human) v (random strong computer program) at 1 1 so that
the human doesn't perforce lose on time?

Todd Durham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.