Author: Ed Murak
Date: 09:09:35 12/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2005 at 11:50:42, William Penn wrote: >Rybka's analysis is fairly short to begin with, compared to most other engines. This is Rybka *B*E*T*A*. Also, it is primarily a "playing" engine, not an analysis one. There is a big difference. >23.01 634:58 +1.24 32.h4 Qf8 33.hxg5 (2.860.235.585) 76 You do not give the position so I can't comment too much on this truncation. There is probably a good reason for it. But for most chess positions, the long PV analysis sequence given is worthless after the first few ply anyway. Reflect on- "I think one move ahead - but it is always the best move!" - possibly Charles Jaffe, as reported by Horowitz in All About Chess and maybe the same thing but a bit differently in How To Think Ahead In Chess. "How many moves ahead do you calculate variations?" "Only one. But this move has to be good" - Richard Reti, as reported by Shashin in Attacking the Queenside. One ahead is all that is ever needed. .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.