Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 11:59:31 12/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2005 at 18:27:01, Claude Le Page wrote: >Sevral posts have noticed that Rybka is rather weak in endgames ,especially >against Junior : this put me on apossible track : when its position is not >clearly better , a Juhior engine uses its fastness to complicate , and Rybka >must follow at maximum depth ,what is very costly in time : so , in endgame , >Rybka is in zeitnot , and analyzes only at depth 13 where thr other is at depth >17 >The same happens between Junior and Hiarcs : Their Knowledge slowen hem too >much in front of engines that use long calculated lines >The same seem to happen vs TogaII 1.1a , whose style is similar to Juniors >Could this be a possible explanation? Uri's explanation is pretty much correct. However it's also true that it's a little bit harder to search selectively in the endgame. Maybe because we haven't put quite so much effort into it. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.