Author: James Constance
Date: 08:33:48 12/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
Occasionally I play standard games on FICs, and have come across computer cheaters. I become suspicious if a player plays consistently strong moves which I don't understand (i.e. not typical human moves in the position). I then analyze the game using one or several engines, to determine if there is a strong correlation between the engine's top moves and the move played, given a similar time to analyze. After this, I am either sure or don't have enough data. An additional clincher is when the opponent's standard rating is much much higher than their blitz rating (where they don't have time to consult an engine). Of course if a player only consults the engine, but does not blindly use its first choice of move, and throws in a couple of his own ideas, it is next to impossible to prove. regards On December 09, 2005 at 18:41:19, Alan Grotier wrote: > > This is a boring question I know. > However I have just started to play on line using F9.Six games I think. > All games seemed very human.But how does one tell? > > I have only played serious games using chess software,F8,CM9K etc. > Computers rate me around 1500. > > I must say I really enjoyed these six on line games.Won three of'em!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.