Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Look here

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 14:46:44 12/10/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 10, 2005 at 17:33:20, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote:

>yes, i'm familiar with the 40 4 results, where fruit does much better....The
>time controls i am using are distintively shorter.
>
>Also, I wonder how much of the rating on the CEGT are due to programs using
>their prefered book versus programs bing forced to play a wide variety of
>positions.
>I'd really prefer a program that can handle all the chess positions well,
>because the program is a tutor for me. What do i care if a program is brilliant
>at handling some special lines in its book but does not know how to defend
>against the yugoslov attack, for example?


All CEGT testing is carried out using a unified book such as Harry Schapp's CEGT
book or Sedat's Perfect 9 book. No porograms use their own books.

Graham.

• Re: Look here Joseph Ciarrochi 14:51:53 12/10/05
  • Re: Look here Graham Banks 15:08:10 12/10/05
    • Re: Look here Zappa 16:39:12 12/10/05
      • Re: Look here gerold daniels 04:19:59 12/11/05
      • Re: Look here Uri Blass 17:45:23 12/10/05
      • Re: Look here Graham Banks 17:03:27 12/10/05
        • Re: Look here Zappa 17:42:17 12/10/05

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.