Author: Russell
Date: 22:40:51 12/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2005 at 17:03:12, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >The evidence (requested by someone ) that fruit may be poor at short time >controls is below. In contrast, fritz 8 seems rather strong > >People have hypothesized that it is due to poor time management. I have seen >fruit make very bad use of time in 2 12 time controls, but fruit seems to use >time similarly to other engines at 5 0. However, to reduce the issue of time >management, i followed someones suggestion and ran 1 1 tournements (see below). >Fruit 2.2.1 is still a bit crappy. why does fruit 2.2. look so weak? > > >this is running on a pentium 2 ghz 598 mhz, 1 gb ram. Nunn 2 test set > >the first set is from a 5 0 tournement, which i stopped because someone >suggested it is better to run it at 1 1 . > >fritz 8 35.5/54 >rybka 30.5/52 >spike 1 29.5/53 >fritz 9 29.5 /53 >toga 1.1 28/53 >fruit 2.2 25.5/53 >pro deo 1.1 21.5/54 >ruffian 2.1 21/53 >list 512 18/53 > > >Tournement 1 minute + 1 sec increment (in progress) > >fritz 9 20/29 >toga II.1 19/29 >fritz 8 18/30 >rybka 1. 0 16/28 >spike 1.0a 13/28 >pro deo 12.5/30 >fruit 2.2 12.5/29 >ruffian 2.1 11.0/29 >list 512 9/29 > > >Maybe fruit will turn it around and start winning more in a couple of hundred >games. Has anybody else observed this weakness (and therefore can save me the >trouble of running the tournement) I agree with 1 +1 Fruit is not that strong. Rybka and DS9 are killer tho.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.