Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:34:01 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 09:28:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 11, 2005 at 09:20:34, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>On December 11, 2005 at 09:01:43, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 11, 2005 at 06:43:30, Jiri Strammlik wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>1.Rybka 99 >>>>2.Rybka 98 >>>>3.Rybka 97 >>>>4.Rybka 96 >>>>. >>>>. >>>>. >>>>. >>>>97.Rybka 3 >>>>98.Rybka 2 >>>>99.Rybka 1 >>>>100.Shredder 10 000 Gold Arian Edition(Kurt Utzinger's settings) >>>> >>>>Bravo Kurt ! >>> >>>I guess that there are going to be many free programs that are going to be >>>better than Rybka1 in 2055 >>> >>>I guess that even fruit and shredder of the end of 2006 are going to be better >>>than it. >>> >>>I do not know if rybka is going to be number 1 but the gap between rybka and >>>gambit fruit is not very large and the best programmers are going to learn from >>>gambit fruit. >>> >>>It is a pity that I see no Gambit fruit in rating lists(for some reason that I >>>do not understand testers prefered to test toga and not gambit fruit). >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hi Uri, >> >>for CEGT we will discuss to include a Gambit Fruit version. The question is if >>Rybka and soon Hiarcs 10 and SmarThink will leave us with enough CPU time to do >>it or if we wait for a final Gambit Fruit release with good results. >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > >I think that you can also test more slowly other engines. >I see no disaster if you need 2 months to get 1000 games and it is not your duty >to get 1000 games in 2 weeks. > > >Uri I can add that I already see 1413 games in your tests for rybka1.0(32 bit) and I think that it is less than 2 weeks since the release of it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.