Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:58:21 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 10:17:58, Albert Silver wrote: >This time the "slightly positional" setting managed to outperform the default >"very positional" settings for the second time, though admittedly not by much. >If anything, it seems likely that "slightly positional" is not weaker than the >default setting. As to whether or not it is stronger, and by how much if so, I >fear many more games would be required, especially if the difference is small. >I'm not against running another gauntlet to test further, I am just trying to >find an opponent that hasn't been tested to death, and that wouldn't lose by >some absurd score. Games are in a separate post. I think that you can take the latest gambit fruit. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.