Author: Albert Silver
Date: 08:01:09 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 10:58:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>On December 11, 2005 at 10:17:58, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>This time the "slightly positional" setting managed to outperform the default
>>"very positional" settings for the second time, though admittedly not by much.
>>If anything, it seems likely that "slightly positional" is not weaker than the
>>default setting. As to whether or not it is stronger, and by how much if so, I
>>fear many more games would be required, especially if the difference is small.
>>I'm not against running another gauntlet to test further, I am just trying to
>>find an opponent that hasn't been tested to death, and that wouldn't lose by
>>some absurd score. Games are in a separate post.
>
>I think that you can take the latest gambit fruit.
>
>Uri
Hmm... that's an option. I was thinking of trying Thinker 5.0b. Which do you
prefer? BTW, where would I get Gambit Fruit?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.