Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:06:58 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 11:01:09, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 11, 2005 at 10:58:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 11, 2005 at 10:17:58, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>This time the "slightly positional" setting managed to outperform the default >>>"very positional" settings for the second time, though admittedly not by much. >>>If anything, it seems likely that "slightly positional" is not weaker than the >>>default setting. As to whether or not it is stronger, and by how much if so, I >>>fear many more games would be required, especially if the difference is small. >>>I'm not against running another gauntlet to test further, I am just trying to >>>find an opponent that hasn't been tested to death, and that wouldn't lose by >>>some absurd score. Games are in a separate post. >> >>I think that you can take the latest gambit fruit. >> >>Uri > >Hmm... that's an option. I was thinking of trying Thinker 5.0b. Which do you >prefer? BTW, where would I get Gambit Fruit? > > Albert You can get version 4bx here http://www.uciengines.de/UCI-Engines/GambitFruit/gambitfruit.html I prefer to see first gambitfruit Thinker5.0b already has some games in the CEGT rating list and is probably weaker than gambit fruit. It's rating is slightly lower than Fruit2.1 http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/cegt/rating-table-all-hidden.shtml Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.