Author: Paul Jacobean Sacral
Date: 09:14:56 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 12:02:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 11, 2005 at 11:49:42, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: > >There is no reason for new design in order to have intelligent evaluation. >Most of my code is not evaluation and if I only replace the evaluation then I do >not cosider it as new design or rewriting the code from scratch. It was meant to be a wordplay, not a serious remark. Although I would suppose that I'm not completely wrong, if an engine makes a big step forward, obviously (with the other alternative being, search design revolution). Evolution is slow developement, step by step with small steps. But Rybka does not represent a small step! :) It's a Beamon jump... Yours truly Paul J. Sacral
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.