Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:33:33 12/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2005 at 12:14:56, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >On December 11, 2005 at 12:02:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 11, 2005 at 11:49:42, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >> >>There is no reason for new design in order to have intelligent evaluation. >>Most of my code is not evaluation and if I only replace the evaluation then I do >>not cosider it as new design or rewriting the code from scratch. > >It was meant to be a wordplay, not a serious remark. Although I would suppose >that I'm not completely wrong, if an engine makes a big step forward, obviously >(with the other alternative being, search design revolution). > >Evolution is slow developement, step by step with small steps. But Rybka does >not represent a small step! :) It's a Beamon jump... > >Yours truly Paul J. Sacral A big step may be also a combination of a lot of small steps. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.