Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 12:28:30 03/25/99
Many games are searched and evaluate with only computer programs. But I always dont look at programs only but my human impute aswell espacialy in many end games a human can look much further and logical then a computer program can an other example is for the programmers The game between Nimzowitsch and Alapin French defence the move 0-0-0!! is still behind the horizon of all chessprograms but after 1 ply all programs find the move as good I like to think that Kasparov is the only one with the same strategy as his idol Aljechin and like to believe and have seen much examples of good posebiletys of sacrefices in an opening aslong as no program can find the move 0-0-0 in first the Sicilian while be very dificult as white gets out of book early maybe I make some programmers think about this also I am still waiting forChess system Tal2 sory if you read this Chris but Chess System Tal didnt see this neither but it is ofcourse not good only to program the program that it will find this move because you programmed it too find it but it must find it on its one otherwise nothing will help the program be better I gues Also can somebody help me with Fritz3 cause I would like to program it again in the original fritz3 there was an option to give important valeus for squares for specific pieces for example a knight on d6 d4 e3 e5 for White and d3 d5 d6 e4 for Black I still have made a lot of anelyses but want to put them on my one website wich I am working on right about now Thanks for the answers in advance
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.