Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:56:34 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 03:13:45, Ryan B. wrote: >On December 12, 2005 at 03:09:33, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: > >>Well, >> >>yes i know its a very difficult topic and may there could be a damage for Vasik >>of course and i have many respect for Vasik's older Rybka versions and he showed >>us that he is a good programer. >> >>But i saw what i saw and in this case must a men do what a men must do. Or in >>other words, i don't why, my heart bled to me with this toughts and i think the >>people should know what i have seen. Sound a bit crazy, sorry. >> >>May i made a mistake with this post, yes. However, i'm learning... >> >>Best, >>Daniel > >I do not accuse Rybka of being a clone but I also do not thing you made a >mistake with your post. Did you get my email? > >Ryan After looking at your post I looked again at the original post and saw more information. I thought initially that the post is only based on similiarity of analysis of one position with only rooks in the board but I see now also that you show analysis of the opening position there and you give rybka style to analyze. I do not claim that there is a lot of similiarity between Rybka and modified Fruit(I did not investigate it) but maybe I did a mistake when I responded to the post and it was better for me to say nothing because my response was only based on part of the information. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.