Author: blass uri
Date: 18:48:19 03/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 1999 at 17:05:22, Dave Gomboc wrote: >I guess what you were saying was that such a position (where white is not >winning and can blunder into a loss) does not exist in KQP vs KQ? I am not 100% >sure of this, but maybe. :-) There are positions when white is not winning and can blunder into a loss but my tests with Fritz showed no problem with them if they are KQP vs KQ. The only mistake that it can do in KQP vs KQ is by assuming that every promotion not to a rook is a draw or by assuming that a promotion to a rook does not lose. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.