Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 04:28:11 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 07:22:57, Ryan B. wrote: >On December 12, 2005 at 07:09:43, CLiebert wrote: > >>On December 12, 2005 at 07:04:57, Ryan B. wrote: >> >>>On December 12, 2005 at 06:53:05, CLiebert wrote: >>> >>>>> 1000 games are played; ratinglist based on > 130.000 activchess-games! >>>> >>>>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/bff-liste.htm >>> >>>I don't think the X settings for gambit fruit are an improvement over the >>>default settings. Still nice too see it on the list though. Thanks and nice >>>web site. >>> >>>Ryan >> >>Accordung to our results you may be right. I wonder if gf is an improvement at >>all over toga?! gambitstyle might be interessting but often no improvement with >>its special evaluations... isn´t it? >> >>Bye >>Christian > > >It is true that the gambit style does not improve overall play (hurts play a >little vs computers in this case but its fun for me). However in my tests other >changes put Gambit Fruit ahead of Toga 1.1 at long time controls. At blitz time >control I think Toga still has an edge. Thanks, >Ryan The problem often is the focus on strenght issues alone. The difference in styles, analysis abillities ect. is ignored or forgotten in the chase for pure competition power. Regards Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.