Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:22:59 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 03:34:15, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On December 11, 2005 at 20:59:08, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: > >Hello, > >sorry for top-posting. > >The Rybka source code is original and pre-dates all of the Fruit releases. > >Re. your demontration, the engine scores, pvs and and even first move are all >totally different - and that's on a position which you selected. I don't get it. Take ten top engines and have them analyze WAC. I am guessing that for at least 90% of the positions, they will agree on the pm and score and probably most of the pv. So to me, agreement on some position is not good evidence of being a clone (besides which you pointed out that they analysis was not the same anyway). At any rate, it is very clear to me that your program is not a copy of some other program. Too bad you should have to defend yourself against totally baseless charges.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.