Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 15:37:44 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 18:28:23, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >Who can do better ? > >[d]5R2/6p1/8/8/1P3n1r/5k2/8/6K1 b - - 0 1 > >83892770: NO BOOK ALL ENG,D - ENET,R, 3m + 0s, rated blitz 2005 >5R2/6p1/8/8/1P3n1r/5k2/8/6K1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit: > >55...g5 > -+ (-5.26) Profondeur: 3 00:00:00 >55...g5 > -+ (-5.20) Profondeur: 4 00:00:00 >55...g5 56.b5 > -+ (-4.67) Profondeur: 5 00:00:00 >55...Th5 56.Tf7 > -+ (-4.89) Profondeur: 5 00:00:00 >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 > -+ (-5.18) Profondeur: 6 00:00:00 5kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.b5 > -+ (-5.36) Profondeur: 7 00:00:00 9kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.b5 g5 > -+ (-5.36) Profondeur: 8 00:00:00 12kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.b5 g5 58.b6 > -+ (-6.25) Profondeur: 9 00:00:00 21kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.b5 g5 58.b6 Rg3 > -+ (-6.25) Profondeur: 10 00:00:00 29kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.b5 g5 58.b6 Rg3 59.Txf4 > -+ (-6.31) Profondeur: 11 00:00:01 48kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.Te7 Ce2+ 58.Txe2 Rxe2 59.Rg2 Td2 60.b5 > -+ (-6.31) Profondeur: 12 00:00:02 116kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.Rh2 g5 58.Tf8 Td2+ 59.Rg1 Td1+ 60.Rh2 > -+ (-9.29) Profondeur: 13 00:00:02 487kN >55...Th5 56.Tf7 Td5 57.Rh2 g5 58.Tf8 Td2+ 59.Rg1 Td1+ 60.Rh2 > -+ (-320.00) Profondeur: 14 00:00:03 693kN Not me. Rybka is outsearching by about a factor of 5x nps (not a good measure, I know). Rybka has some good tricks. Too bad we'll never learn of them. Alpha=2627 Beta=3428 Maxdepth=9999999 MaxTime=16666666 Itr/Max Mv Time Score Nodes PV 1/ 4 f3e4 0.00 3052 30 Pf3e4 2/ 6 h4g4 0.00 3054 181 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg4g2 3/ 7 g7g5 0.01 3026 973 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Pf3e4 4/ 9 g7g5 0.02 3028 1688 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg4g2 5/12 g7g5 0.06 3026 6377 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg4g2 Pf1e1 6/13 g7g5 0.15 3036 17659 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg4g2 Pf7e7 Pf4d5 7/17 h4g4 0.57 3038 69481 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pf3e4 Pb4b5 Pf4d5 Pf8e8 Pe4d4 Pe8e1 Pg7g5 8/24 h4g4 1.45 3050 178850 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Pg4g2 Pf1e1 Pg2b2 Pf7g7 Pf3e4 9/26> h4g4 8.55 3450 1087069 Ph4g4 Pg1f1 Pg7g5 Pf8f7 Pg4g2 Pf1e1 Pg2b2 Pf7g7 Pf3e4 Pg7g5 Pb2b4 9/26 h4h5 9.02 4028 1151011 Th4h5 Tf8f7 Tg7g6 Tf7f8 Th5b5 Tf8c8 Tb5b4 10/26 h4h5 9.65 4032 1235345 Th4h5 Tf8f7 Tg7g6 Tf7f6 Th5b5 Tg1f1 Tb5b4 Tf1e1 11/26 h4h5 11.06 4042 1420637 Ph4h5 Pf8f7 Pg7g6 Pf7f8 Ph5b5 Pf8e8 Pb5b4 Pe8e1 Pb4b2 Pe1e7 Pf4d5 12/27 h4h5 15.74 4041 2071137 Th4h5 Tf8f7 Tg7g6 Tf7f6 Th5b5 Tf6g6 Tf4g6 Tg1h1 Tmtmt 13/32 h4h5 27.42 4050 3621949 Th4h5 Tf8f7 Tg7g6 Tf7f8 Th5b5 Tf8e8 Tb5b4 Te8e1 Tb4b2 14/34>Th4h5 79.47 4450 10434084 Th4h5 Tf8f7 Tg7g6 Tf7f8 Th5b5 Tg1f1 Tb5b4 Tf1e1 Tb4b2 Tmtmt nps=131302 ha=11.00% q=56.0% bc=51% br=2.95% mp=0<>1079214080 pawnx=6893 recapx=10616 qcheckx=0 checkx=472720 qfutilx=230516 onereplyx=82231 mthrx=371 futilx=0 bm x=18170 h4h5 f8f7 g7g6 f7f8 h5b5 g1f1 b5b4 f1e1 b4b2 + 14.00/34.00 100% 1/1 ha=11 79.47 10434084 10434084/79/131302 6893/10616/371/472720/230516/82231/0/ 18170 pawnx/recapx/mthrx/checkx/qfutilx/onereplyx/futilx/bmx -------------------------------- Missed: branching factor = 2.95
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.