Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:09:32 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 18:29:26, Chessfun wrote: >CEGT Blitz Rating List updated: > >BLITZ: >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ > >8 New engines added: > >Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit >Chess Tiger 2004 Normal It seems that chess tiger 2004 normal played 120 games out of 520 games against ktulu7.1 I think that when one engine play so many games against single opponent the rating may be misleading because it is possible that one program has good result against specific opponent. I suggest that you reduce the number of all games between 2 opponents to 30 games for rating calculation and it means that tiger2004 got 14.75 out of 30 against ktulu7.1 and not 59 out of 120 against it because you should not let one player to decide about the rating list because by this idea if you play 1000 games between Fritz9 and TogaII1.0 and Fritz9 scores less than 45% you can tell fritz9 to go down in the list and togaII1.0 to fight for the first place. Of course if there is data about more games I do not say not to use it but you should use it only to get better estimate for the result in 30 games. Tiger also played only against 6 opponents so I think that for calculation you should assume that it played 180 games by reducing the number of games of it against every opponent to 30 and 180<300. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.