Author: Chessfun
Date: 19:04:53 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2005 at 21:41:25, Russell wrote: >>Testing of Chess Tiger 2004 Normal is also limited in that it only runs in the >>Chess Partner interface and therefore the variety of engines to play against >>isn't so great. >> >>Further the method of testing within Chess Partner don't allow easy use of match >>play gauntlets as Chessbase GUI's do. >> >>Last assuming it will end up playing some 1500 games ultimately it's rating may >>get a bit skewed at the beginning. >> >What exactly do u mean variety isnt great? There are many engines that run in >Chess Partner; it supports UCI and Winboard protocol. Actually testing isnt much >diff in Chesspartner than that of Chessbase, I guess CT2004 makes it diff tho. >Nevertheless, To quote myself "variety of engines to play against isn't so great" I would say that has to be 100% correct since none of the Chessbase native engines can play easily against Chess Tiger 2004. > U can always use an Internet Chess Server to connect the engines >and match them. And how easy would it be to match Chess Tiger 2004 v say Fritz 9. Lets see. One PC for Chess Tiger 2004 in CP GUI and another two to get the Chessbase program to connect to ICC. Let's try another Playchess ok Fritz 9 no problem v Tiger 2004 problem, see it isn't quite so easy as you seem to think it is. >BTW, I wonder if any crashed on time games by Rybka was counted. >I think they should be counted since the version is beta and Rybka crashes in >the end quiet a times. I never saw a single Rybka crash on time. The time control is 4/40 repeating. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.