Author: Graham Banks
Date: 22:57:01 12/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2005 at 01:21:34, Ed Murak wrote: >On December 12, 2005 at 14:34:30, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: > >>Hello Vasik, >> >>after some review work from some experts here, >>i must send you my apology ! Sorry about my posting about Rybka >>and congrats to a so strong engine. >>Its seems to be i was dazzled from some moves and outputs. >> >>Sorry! >> >>Best, >>Daniel > > >Daniel, > >Always best to apologize when wrong, well done, IMO. If only all people could >follow your example. Usually they do not. > >Your kind message above has been sent to Mr Rajlich, who I am sure could be >relieved he didn't do anything wrong. He knew that already, of course. :) > >But could I make a little suggestion, purely voluntarily on your part, which >could even be viewed as a favor or request just from me (a total nobody) and no >one else? > >The original suggestion, theory or even accusation as some could have read it, >by you appeared in- >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?469130 >The best way to retract, IMO, is for you to post a _reply_ to that i.e. to your >own original message, with a SHOUTING subject:, something like: > "SORRY, I MADE A MISTAKE! PLEASE IGNORE THIS THREAD" >Daniel, this is only my suggestion... you can do it or not. As a programmer >yourself, you can imagine that it can be hurtful to read incorrect things about >one's work. :) > >I have got very good news for you and everyone. In my play of the latest Rybka >test, it is leading (at 40/40+40/40+40, opening book Fritz9.ctg for both, modern >PC) against Fritz 9 by a huge margin! Right now, game 12 is being played (each >opening is played twice with the usual reversal), and the score to RYBKA is >+8 =2 -1 which is almost unbelievable. That is 81.8%, +261 ELO T.P. >The RYBKA is Beta version latest, released versions will be much better because >of endgame knowledge being added and EGTB support and other things. Fritz 9 was >playing with full 3/4/5 EGTBs, even many 6 ones but I forget whether it looks at >those. >Of course the match is too short, but 81.8%... eh? >I may post in CCC the interim results and of course all the PGN when more games >are played. > >Thanks for your time. Hi Ed, we do not encourage members to "shout" (posting messages with caps lock on)in this forum. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.