Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nunn-Test: We remember us, how it all begin!

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 09:38:08 12/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


Nunn-Test: We remember us, how it all begin!

Year 1997, CSS Magazine would seen which program is the best without books! :-)
Also make extra a GM Dr. John Nunn a neutrally Testset first. The name he gives
him Nunn-Test.

Other Programmer was "not lucky" with this test then in this time Fritz 5.00 was
the best tactic-program, and the Test have many tactic Positions (see only the
last variation with german: Bauernraubvariante in the Sizilian Opening ). The
CSS says the is a Gambit. That is not sure but Ok! :-)

In this Year 1997 Fritz 5.00 beats all other Engines, and the Magazine CSS says
that this test is neutrally and from an Grandmaster and is the best way to test
the Programs!

Now after 9 Years, the test is newer the Best, why this?

My Opinion: If Fritz beat all other engines then is the Test the best! :-)
If Fritz losing then is a Test poor. :-)

That is a Fact!

In Fallow postings You can find 3 Rare pieces of games (safe you good in Your
Database):

Fritz 5.00 vs. Genius 5
Fritz 5 vs. Rebel 9
Fritz 5 vs. Mchess Pro 7

All this Machtes won Fritz 5.00 in Year 1997! Also it is a fact that this test
is in Year 2005/6 the best - he is from a Grandmaster makes, and the best. And
now fritz 9 are losing. That is Fact!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.