Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-Rybka predictions

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:01:00 12/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2005 at 18:54:56, stuart taylor wrote:

>On December 13, 2005 at 18:48:53, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 13, 2005 at 18:12:53, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>
>>>On December 13, 2005 at 17:42:30, adam wilks wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>"If" i beat Rybka 6-0 am i a GM strength player or a patzer ?
>>>
>>>
>>>First of all, I would bet my house that no gm could beat rybka 6-0, nor computer
>>>program, even hydra, i'm sure there would be a draw in there somewhere.
>>
>>I guess that GM's can do it easily when Rybka is playing at fixed depth of 1
>>ply.
>>
>>Uri
>
>What's the purpose of this statement? Anyway, a GM would then lose on the clock,
>because he would have to move in less than 1/10,000th of a secoind each move, to
>be in equal fairness.

It depends how you define equal fairness.
Maybe he needs to search the same size of tree as rybka to be in equal fairness.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.