Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 03:16:31 12/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2005 at 06:10:11, Norm Pollock wrote: >On December 14, 2005 at 05:30:59, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On December 14, 2005 at 05:22:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On December 14, 2005 at 05:13:48, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On December 14, 2005 at 05:06:41, Mimic wrote: >>>> >>>>>============================================================== >>>>>Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit +282-130=388 59.50% 476.0/800 +66 >>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>Fruit 2.2.1 +130-282=388 40.50% 324.0/800 -66 >>>>>============================================================== >>>>> >>>>> Games Rybka >>>>>======================== >>>>> 100 +31 >>>>> 200 ----- +33 >>>>> 300 +50 >>>>> 400 ----- +50 >>>>> 500 +53 >>>>> 600 ----- +60 >>>>> 700 +63 >>>>> 800 ----- +66 >>>>>======================== >>>>> >>>>>Pentium M Dothan 2.52Ghz >>>>>32MB Hash >>>>>No EGTB >>>>> >>>>>Mimic >>>> >>>>has Rybka some hidden learning? The steady increase of the rating difference is >>>>surprising. >>> >>>The rating difference didn't increase, just the plus score. (And it wasn't >>>steady, either) >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >> >>No, +66 is the rating difference, not the score difference. >> >>Surprisingly it doubled between 200 and 800 games... >>Who know it will be after 1200 games ... > >No, the rating difference takes into account changes in BOTH elos. Therefore the >rating difference is +132. I think you're wrong. This table show that Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit is 66 Elo stronger than Fruit 2.2.1 (and logically Fruit 2.2.1 is 66 Elo weaker than Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.