Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-Computer openings that are tactical.

Author: blass uri

Date: 12:32:58 03/26/99

Go up one level in this thread



On March 26, 1999 at 14:41:55, Dann Corbit wrote:

>By the way, the analysis on the fixed position went like this:
>
>r1b2rk1/2q1bppp/p1npp3/1pnB1N2/4P1P1/2N1B3/PPP1QP1P/2KR2R1 w - -
>Depth: 13 plies
>Nodes examined: 112909738
>Centipawn eval: 403
>Preferred variation: Bxc6 Bb7 Nxe7+ Qxe7 Bxc5 dxc5 Bxb7 Qxb7 Rd6 c4 Qe3 b4 Ne2
>b3 cxb3 cxb3 axb3
>Preferred move: Bxc6

The right position is the same with black to move and not white to move.

It is clear that the w was a mistake because the original message was about the
claim that programs play the losing exf5 or exd5.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.