Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Depends whether or not you like anarchy

Author: Andrew Dados

Date: 16:58:43 12/14/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 14, 2005 at 12:58:27, Graham Banks wrote:

>On December 14, 2005 at 05:39:25, Franz Hagra wrote:
>
>>>Another example of why a forum change is required.
>>
>>I don't think so - this forum is one of the best computerchess forum all over
>>the world - surely not perfect, but well democratic and a place of freedom of
>>speech!
>>
>>Hagra
>
>
>A place where trolls abound with no way for moderators to control them.
>I think I'd speak for most genuine members here when I say I'd like to see this
>change.
>I'll choose good manners and respect over lawlessness and vitriole any day!
>
>Regards, Graham.

Good for you. But your political correctness goes way over the top for my taste.
And for others as I see clearly from current postings.

And I guess for the charter, too. If someone posts gibberish I call it a
gibberish. When someone posts nonsense I call nonsense.

Currently I see a thread halted by [Moderation] Graham Banks every day now. And
as other noted it is done selectively, too.

 Never before (member since circa 1999) seen so many posts deleted without even
notification email. Because someone doesn't like hiarcs. Or as in my case just
for strongly disagreeing but factual posting. No name calling and boom - Graham
Banks deletes the post without warning.

Maybe, just maybe, your overreactioning brings the trolls out from normal
posters harmed by your heavy hand. It does it for me, certainly.

 You are a discussion killer, dude.

-Andrew-



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.