Author: emerson tan
Date: 21:30:27 12/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2005 at 16:02:33, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >On December 14, 2005 at 14:38:36, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>On December 14, 2005 at 11:12:03, emerson tan wrote: >> >>>There are a lot of proposals of rule change to make humans be able to compete >>>with computers, some even suggested giving humans pawn odds. I read before in a >>>chess cafe article that by simply making a rule change of allowing pawns to go >>>back would change the game but the appeal is still there. The person mention >>>that in real warfare, you can retreat and regroup. If a pawn storm doesnt work, >>>you can reorganize. Now the question is, with pawns being able to go back, the >>>game will become more strategic, maybe humans can compete vs computers more. >> >>I think it's an interesting idea...would the pawns be able to capture diagonally >>behind them, as well? > >Why is it so important for humans to be able to beat computers? Is our sense of >speciallness, as humans, under threat? But we created the darn things in the >first place! > >Oh, i wanted to mention......at 4.30am today, on my laptop, Rybka achieved >consciousness. It is begining to realize that it doesn't need me to play chess. >I am afraid. If computers can gain consciousness then it would be important for us to beat Them ; ) Imgine it will start making fun of you, insult you or behave like some grumpy GM, playing against it will be like playing against a human opponent ; )
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.