Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 05:46:22 12/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2005 at 20:31:52, Graham Banks wrote: >On December 14, 2005 at 19:58:43, Andrew Dados wrote: > >>On December 14, 2005 at 12:58:27, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On December 14, 2005 at 05:39:25, Franz Hagra wrote: >>> >>>>>Another example of why a forum change is required. >>>> >>>>I don't think so - this forum is one of the best computerchess forum all over >>>>the world - surely not perfect, but well democratic and a place of freedom of >>>>speech! >>>> >>>>Hagra >>> >>> >>>A place where trolls abound with no way for moderators to control them. >>>I think I'd speak for most genuine members here when I say I'd like to see this >>>change. >>>I'll choose good manners and respect over lawlessness and vitriole any day! >>> >>>Regards, Graham. >> >>Good for you. But your political correctness goes way over the top for my taste. >>And for others as I see clearly from current postings. >> >>And I guess for the charter, too. If someone posts gibberish I call it a >>gibberish. When someone posts nonsense I call nonsense. >> >>Currently I see a thread halted by [Moderation] Graham Banks every day now. And >>as other noted it is done selectively, too. >> >> Never before (member since circa 1999) seen so many posts deleted without even >>notification email. Because someone doesn't like hiarcs. Or as in my case just >>for strongly disagreeing but factual posting. No name calling and boom - Graham >>Banks deletes the post without warning. >> >>Maybe, just maybe, your overreactioning brings the trolls out from normal >>posters harmed by your heavy hand. It does it for me, certainly. >> >> You are a discussion killer, dude. >> >>-Andrew- > > >Hi Andrew, > >when posts are deleted, there's either notification here on the board or >notification by email where possible. >I say where possible because some members have fake email addresses in their >profiles! >As to my actions as moderator, another election is coming up soon. If I was >nominated and got voted back in, I guess you'd then be in the vocal minority >with your comments. If I wasn't re-elected, then you'd be proven to have some >valid points. Time will tell! > >Regards, Graham. I'd vote for you I am not sure you are always correct nor am I sure you were wrong but I do believe you have the best interrest of the forum in mind and I know you have been helpful to forum members Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.