Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:09:06 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 05:51:23, Günther Simon wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 04:09:51, Henrik Dinesen wrote: > >>On December 16, 2005 at 03:27:58, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >> >>>On December 16, 2005 at 03:16:21, Henry Bixby wrote: >>> >>>>On December 16, 2005 at 02:09:08, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>> >>>>>I've been sent, among others here a deluge of e-mails and they are despicable! >>>>> >>>>>This is only a sample, please moderators, let this stand. >>>>> >>>>>I think this says it all. I also know many programers and moderators are on >>>>>Chan's "Hit List", it's absurd to the extreme. >>>>> >>>>>Terry >>>>>================================================================================ >>>>>You DUMBASS! Rybka You've been Conned. Scammed >>>>> >>>>>and TOOO FUCKING DUMB TO SEE IT! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Once installed on your Hard Drive it uses your Top >>>>>Engine Opening Book! >>>>> >>>>>Once installed it accesses and uses your EGTB'S! >>>>> >>>>>New game, >>>>>[D]8/6k1/8/8/7B/6KN/8/8 w - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit: >>>>> >>>>>1. +- (#13): 1.Kg4 >>>>>2. +- (#14): 1.Kf4 >>>>>3. +- (#23): 1.Kf3 >>>>>4. +- (#27): 1.Nf4 >>>>>5. +- (#27): 1.Ng5 >>>>>6. +- (#29): 1.Kf2 >>>>>7. +- (#29): 1.Nf2 >>>>>8. +- (#30): 1.Kg2 >>>>>9. +- (#30): 1.Ng1 >>>>>10. +- (#30): 1.Bg5 >>>>>11. +- (#30): 1.Be7 >>>>>12. +- (#31): 1.Kh2 >>>>>13. +- (#31): 1.Bd8 >>>>>14. = (0.00): 1.Bf6+ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Between the Top Opening Book & the EGTB'S which gives Perfect Play >>>>> >>>>>it SUCKS~ >>>> >>>> >>>>I think he is right:) >>> >>>No, he is not. Rybka 1.0 Beta has not EGTB access code. >>> >>>- Andy >> >> >>Sure he isn't! :) That surely shows a lack of understanding far below the >>average. Apart from the TB-issue, Rybka, like all other engines uses the book he >>selects for it. >> >>And for the approach, the e-mail itself. That talks for irself. :( >> >>Regards >>Henrik > >It is a helpless case. Chandler always confuses computer-chess with >what _his CB installation_ does for him on _his machine_. >Although told dozens of times he is not able to generalize computer-chess >terms in a meaningful way. > >Guenther I think that it is also a problem of chessbase gui GUI should not say "Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit" when Rybka does not analyze. I use it more than winboard only because of some advantages that I do not have in winboard like ability to see the engine analysis and not only the last line. I can also use shredder gui for that purpose but fritz gui has other advantages like option for next best that I do not see in shredder gui. Inspite of all the advantages I do not want to buy new gui from chessbase because I am afraid that it is going to have more bugs. If I read a report that they only fix bugs in the existing gui and add nothing then I think that it is going to be better for chessbase. I do not understand why they think that changing the gui is more important than fixing bugs and I do not understand why they need to replace the gui for users who install a new engine that they buy(I think that it is better to give them more options when they can choose between using old gui and using new gui after installing new version). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.