Author: CLiebert
Date: 04:55:41 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2005 at 16:53:59, Ryan B. wrote: >On December 15, 2005 at 10:13:48, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>The BfF List is not important for Computerchess! >> >>Reason: Another Rating Lists are much more respectablly. >> >>Ed. > >I do not understand your bias, there is nothing wrong with the Bff list. >Ryan It is a special question and has nothing to do with the list and the work of a lot of css-readers and guests. I just tried to reactivate Eds membership for the german css-forum, Ed asked for this again a few days ago via Email ... I would like to but I still have problems to convince the majority of the other mods to reinvite him. It looks like Ed would like to demonstrate why they are correct and not me. Unpolite statements without any justification why he came to this conclusion like this "Reason: Another Rating Lists are much more respectablly" are not the way we would like to argue in css-forum.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.