Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:57:07 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 11:50:06, Chrilly Donninger wrote: > >> >>Are now the Computer Chess Programs strong like corr chess GMs? I seems YES! > >I think in general strong Correspondence GMs like Arno Nickel are still better. >But we do our best to catch up. I have made the evaluation aggressive to >increase the tactical complications. This works quite well in tournaments but >not in correspondence chess. >Rybka will also help in this process, because there is now a sparring partner >available who plays different to the rest. There is now less imbreeding (I hope >that Rybka stays different). Rybka is just doing what junior already was doing, so what is the difference here? Vincent >Rybka sparring: I had yesterday a funny match with 2 underpromotions in 1 game. >I always thought that underpromotion happens only in studies, but not in real >games. I was considering in the past to remove underpromotions within the search >and allow it just on the root. But its obviously not a good idea. One can not >only learn from the strong but also from the bad features of others. > >Chrilly
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.