Author: David Shanholtzer
Date: 12:33:26 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 15:19:07, Dr. Wael Deeb wrote: >....????..... ty = thank you.\ To which I also add a thank you, and am currently downloading it. I imagine it will be a very useful addition. But, as I surmise the book will consist of all solid lines leading, more or less, to equality for both white and black, would I be correct in assuming there will be no "gambit" lines with unclear evaluations, or unclear compensation? You may have guessed that in my ancientness I seem to be regressing back to the "romantic" school. :) David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.