Author: Sarah Bird
Date: 07:24:53 03/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 1999 at 10:17:40, Hans Havermann wrote: >On March 26, 1999 at 22:51:55, Adnan wrote: > >>2rr2k1/pp1qnppp/2n1p3/3p4/1bPP3P/1P2RNP1/PB3P2/1BRQ2K1 w - - 0 20 >>Earlier I played 20. Bxh7+ >>But now look at this: 20 a3 Ba5 21.b4 Bc7 > ><deletia> > >>And white wins... > >And therefore doesn't it seem appropriate that instead of 20...Ba5, 20...Bd6? I have followed this and the other thread on the same subject at rgcc. 20).....Bd6 still loses in both the 21) c5 line or the 21) Bxh7 line. I spent over 2 hours last evening looking at Bd6 in place of Ba5. In all cases the win for white is deep meaning around 18 or 20 moves and Bxh7 is a very complicated line whenever played, either at move 20) as the original post in rgcc or move 21) as with Bd6 or 22) per Adnans latest post. I do find it odd that DB would have allowed the possibility of 20) Bxh7. Tactical blunder.....yes I think so. UltraB.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.