Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 02:00:00 12/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2005 at 04:33:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 17, 2005 at 04:14:32, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>Test is on a pentium 4 with a sample of 22 gambits across the eco codes (engine >>forced to play both sides). Time was 25 minutes with 1 sec increment >> >>Fritz 9 had 14 wins, 18 loses, 12 draws >> >>This may be a notable drop in performance for fritz 9. For example, the CEGT >>blitz (40 4), using more standard test sets, has fritz 9 well in front of gambit >>fruit both head to head (15 wins 8 loses 7 draws) and in terms of rating (fritz >>9 has 100 points on gambit fruit). > >The CEGT did not test the same Gambitfruit so the comparison is not fair. > >Uri true....but the difference is between gambit fruit 1 beta 3 (CEGT) and gambit fruit 1 beta 4...Gambit fruit might have made a big jump in power between those two versions, i suppose..Do you think it possible? My guess is that it is the difference in test set My problem is that i do not have a basement full of computers and can't really do the tests the way i'd like to (e.g., huge sample size, holding hardware constant, looking at different versions etc)...I'd love someebody to do this with the gambit set
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.