Author: Ryan B.
Date: 02:08:38 12/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2005 at 05:00:00, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >On December 17, 2005 at 04:33:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 17, 2005 at 04:14:32, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >> >>>Test is on a pentium 4 with a sample of 22 gambits across the eco codes (engine >>>forced to play both sides). Time was 25 minutes with 1 sec increment >>> >>>Fritz 9 had 14 wins, 18 loses, 12 draws >>> >>>This may be a notable drop in performance for fritz 9. For example, the CEGT >>>blitz (40 4), using more standard test sets, has fritz 9 well in front of gambit >>>fruit both head to head (15 wins 8 loses 7 draws) and in terms of rating (fritz >>>9 has 100 points on gambit fruit). >> >>The CEGT did not test the same Gambitfruit so the comparison is not fair. >> >>Uri >true....but the difference is between gambit fruit 1 beta 3 (CEGT) and gambit >fruit 1 beta 4...Gambit fruit might have made a big jump in power between those >two versions, i suppose..Do you think it possible? My guess is that it is the >difference in test set > > >My problem is that i do not have a basement full of computers and can't really >do the tests the way i'd like to (e.g., huge sample size, holding hardware >constant, looking at different versions etc)...I'd love someebody to do this >with the gambit set Yes Beta 3 was a tuning version and is much slower than all other versions. Beta 2 tests to be stronger than beta 3 and beta 4bx is the strongest so far. Ryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.