Author: Bahram Namjou
Date: 10:13:16 12/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
THis is a good support (160 games)...my personal games (which is less than 40 games) shows that sp a little behind in blitz games but perform better in slow games...It still needs more games of course to be tested and Vasik also wrote a comment for his final version: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?470742 bn On December 16, 2005 at 20:11:37, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 19:23:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 16, 2005 at 19:04:22, Bahram Namjou wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>It seems that Rybka SP is better "only" in slow games >20 min...bn >> >>I do not understand how did you get your conclusions. >> >>slightly positional scored slightly better than the default(1.5 points more than >>the default in 160 games) >> >>All the games were in the same time control. >> >>Uri > >One would also have to calculate the relative ratings of the opponents to know >whether it really did better though. All the same, claiming it only did better >in fast games means that he has comparative results for slower games. I haven't >seen them so I'm curious. > > Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.