Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Once and for all lets make some decision about naming suspected cheaters

Author: Miles

Date: 15:00:59 03/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 27, 1999 at 14:34:11, odell hall wrote:

>
>On March 27, 1999 at 08:29:32, Miles wrote:
>
>>Good point. If Moderators moderate, then immoderate "cheating hysteria" will or
>>will not be the focus of CCC. Any ideas?
>
>
>  You say "cheating Hysteria" ??  That's funny , I have seen no cheating
>hysteria on these message boards at all.  I think only two post in Six month's
>dealing with cheating, which was mine and will singleton's.  The "hysteria"
>seems to be in the unneccessary "overreation to these post.

Excuse me; I wasn't trying to hurt anybody's feelings by using the word
"hysteria." Retract "hysteria." I was just wondering if the CCC forum &/or the
moderators believe that "the accusing of individuals (proof or no) of cheating"
is the purpose of this forum. If it lies outside the scope of the CCC forum,
then such needs clarifying by the moderators. Right? What about a vote? If it's
OK, then OK, OK? But clarification would be good, seems like.
Again, pardon me if my characterazation misstruck a tender spot. Not intended in
any way. Sorry.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.