Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No! Most of 2005 Shredder 9 was top.

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 08:02:47 12/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 18, 2005 at 08:11:08, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 18, 2005 at 07:50:24, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>And now there are other things which are in preparation for 2006, or
>>partly...end of 2005, by I wasn't counting that.
>>S.Taylor
>
>If we talk about improvement in 2005 we compare 31.12.2005 with 1.1.2005

I asked if 2006 might be a record year for improvED strength (not the improvING
of strength) i.e, that the strengh had already improved in time for the new
upgrades which will be seen throught most of 2006.
Not that the improvements will be MADE during that year. The actual making, I
agree, is to have been in year 2005.

>
>This means that we probably compare Rybka64 bit with Shredder9 and the
>improvement is clearly bigger than the improvement in previous years.

So basically, yes! But I also mean, even with 32 bit.
And, Rybca might yet not be the last word before 2006 (and Hiarcs isn't?)
S.Taylor

>
>It is possible that we are going to have even bigger improvement in 2006 but we
>still do not know it.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.